#Photo mechanic vs fastrawviewer full
#Photo mechanic vs fastrawviewer software
#Photo mechanic vs fastrawviewer plus

It’s a long way from there (and we’re not there yet) to a reliable, fast, powerful and capable DAM. Improve the image browser, sure, so that it’s possible to do triage quickly and efficiently in Photolab at least for small sets. dop files, not passing it all through perfectly) and with failure of Nik 4 to play well with Photoshop CS6, Affinity Photo and C1 and other hosts. The problem areas are incomplete XMP support for metadata (storing some in the database or in. What should be a selling point but DxO are self-sabotaging this point is cross-compatibility with other professional photo software.

fast workflow with U-point quick masking.

best in class noise reduction (by a long way).

the quality of the lens database and optical corrections.

Skylum entirely failed with their DAM in Luminar and ended up not releasing it at all (promising a DAM as a feature but instead offered a poor quality image browser). C1 is on the third version of their DAM now and none of them work well. Same applies to iMatch, Photo Supreme and CaptureOne. Photo Mechanic has been working on DAM for twenty years and there are still issues. If Adobe were attempting to sabotage the DxO community forums, they couldn’t invent a better mole.Īny DAM (there’s nothing even close to DAM in Photolab 4 – it’s an underfeatured and slow image browser), even if it’s released in Photolab 5 will not be production ready for another three to five years. That’s always been Photolab’s future with you Colin. Just the kind of interface most Photolab users like.

#Photo mechanic vs fastrawviewer full

It turns out that my custom configured FastRawViewer with just a line of info at the bottom and full screen is the best way to rate and cull photos on a computer with a powerful GPU. I thought that by adding Photo Mechanic I would no longer want to use FastRawViewer.

#Photo mechanic vs fastrawviewer software

There’s other software which has its advocates here like iMatch and Photo Supreme which others swear by (not for me).

#Photo mechanic vs fastrawviewer plus

There’s Photo Mechanic and Photo Mechanic Plus at a high budget, the latter offering proper cataloguing of huge groups of images and flexible DAM. There’s FastRawViewer at a low budget at $25. Two of the best create XMP sidecars which Photolab has no trouble reading on import. And there’s much faster and more effective software for rating photos than Photolab. Photolab’s idea of improving the DAM is improving the triage/culling tools.

Photolab is not even pretending to manage all one’s images. If you are waiting for a class leading DAM to use Photolab, you are barking up the wrong tree. Whether V5 will change that remains an open question - the DAM is not even close imo.